1952 Tremonton UFO Film — Navy Photographer's 16mm Footage (PR159) — U.S. Air Force Project Blue Book / U.S. Navy / AARO 1952-07-02 declassified UAP records PURSUE
👥 Witness Account🏛 U.S. Air Force Project Blue Book / U.S. Navy / AARO📅 1952-07-02

1952 Tremonton UFO Film — Navy Photographer's 16mm Footage (PR159)

Published · Last updated

📅 Overview

Near Tremonton, Utah, on July 2, 1952, U.S. Navy Chief Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse saw 12 to 14 reflective objects in the sky and filmed them in color with a handheld Bell & Howell Auto Master camera. Newhouse was a Navy photography specialist with more than 1,000 hours of aerial-photography experience, and the Air Force assessed him as an honest and reliable witness.

The film became one of the best-known visual cases of Project Blue Book, the U.S. Air Force's 1952-1969 UFO investigation program. The original footage and the investigation files were released together in PURSUE release 6 on September 18, 2026.

PR159 — Tremonton film (1952, 1 min 10 s) — National Archives digitization of a 16mm Kodachrome print; unrelated sewing-equipment footage from 0:55
📷 U.S. Department of War / DVIDS (public domain) · PURSUE release 6 (2026-09-18)

🎥 What the Footage Shows

  • A 70-second digitization of a 16mm Kodachrome color print.
  • From 0:55 the reel switches to unrelated footage that appears to show sewing equipment. The surviving print may be a composite, but the record does not say how or when the materials were combined.
  • The original roll continued with mountain scenery from Idaho, which is not in this digitization.
  • AARO comment: some documents call it 35mm film, but the original submission paperwork identifies a 50-foot roll of 16mm film; the 35mm versions were later blow-up duplicates.

🛂 How the Assessment Changed

When Who Assessment
1952 (early) Air Force, Project Blue Book Considered birds or balloons reflecting sunlight and a mirage effect; no conclusion
December 1952 Blue Book + General Mills balloon specialists General consensus that the objects closely resembled "pillow balloons"; one representative thought they were too bright and moved too fast. No balloon release in the area was found
1953 U.S. Naval Photographic Interpretation Center Characteristics inconsistent with natural phenomena or known aerospace technology; recommended a better-resourced investigation
Later Air Force Favored seabirds reflecting sunlight

The Air Force file also records that, with no fixed reference points, the objects' distance, size, altitude and speed cannot be determined from the film alone. High-speed calculations relied on the unverified assumption that the camera was held still.

🤔 How to Read It

Tremonton is a case where the Navy and the Air Force read the same footage differently. The Air Force's final view was seabirds, but its own records say the film alone cannot settle the question, so interpretations still differ.

Source: DOW-UAP-PR159, Historical Film of Reported UFOs, Utah, 1952 / 7/2/52 / Tremonton, Utah

📷 U.S. Department of War / DVIDS (Public Domain)

❓ Frequently asked questions

What is the Tremonton UFO film?

Footage shot on July 2, 1952, near Tremonton, Utah, by U.S. Navy photography specialist Chief Warrant Officer Delbert Newhouse, showing 12 to 14 reflective objects on 16mm color film. It is one of Project Blue Book's best-known visual cases; the original footage (PR159) and the investigation files were released in PURSUE release 6 in September 2026.

What was the official conclusion?

The Air Force first reached no conclusion; in December 1952 reviewers thought the objects resembled pillow balloons, and later assessments favored seabirds reflecting sunlight. The U.S. Naval Photographic Interpretation Center, by contrast, judged in 1953 that the objects' characteristics were inconsistent with natural phenomena or known aerospace technology. The Air Force file also notes that distance, size and speed cannot be determined from the film alone.

Who filmed it?

U.S. Navy Chief Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse, a Navy photography specialist with more than 1,000 hours of aerial-photography experience. The Air Force assessed him as honest and reliable, and he retired as a Chief Warrant Officer 4.

Why does sewing equipment appear after 0:55?

That is unrelated footage of what appears to be a sewing-equipment demonstration. The surviving print may be a composite, but the record does not say how or when it was combined. The Idaho mountain scenery that originally followed is not in this digitization.

Where can I see the film and documents?

On the Department of War's PURSUE portal (war.gov/UFO) and on this page, which links the video PR159, Blue Book files D102 and D103, personnel record D104, the Air Force flying-discs file D105 and the Navy analysis D098.